Saturday, June 2, 2018

Why would you use な for そう forms of い adjectives?


I am just now really diving into adjectives and how they work in Japanese. It was to my surprise that I heard 『楽{たの}しいそうなお祭{まつ}りね』 being used. Does the そう usage require な even for い adjectives?



Answer



There are two things I would like to do as part of the answer to your question.


First, you may not have been aware that there was a mistake in your sentence. I will address that first.


You wrote:



楽{たの}しいそう




It should be:



楽{たの}しそう



For the formation of the そうだ grammar is as follows:



  • Vmasu + そうだ

  • adj(i/na) stem + そうだ



Examples:



話しそう (verb)
楽しそう (i adjective)
静かそう (na adjective)



Source: A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar (See below)




Now for the question you acked. According to A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar (Seiichi Makino and Michio Tsutsui):




そうだ is a な-type adjective; The prenominal form is そうな. Examples:



高そうな車
taka souna kuruma
(A car which looks espensive (= an expensive looking car))


雨が降りそうな空
ame ga furi souna sora
(lit. the sky which looks like it will bring rain)





So to directly answer your question:



Does the そう usage require な even for い adjectives?



The answer is yes. Note that most of the time, you will find this formation at the end of a sentence requiring it to end with だ/です. However, if you plan on using this grammar as an adjective (i.e. you mean to use it to modify a noun), you should treat is as a na-type adjective.


Note: I included a link to the amazon listing of the book I used for my source. If you plan to purchase it, look around. I have definitely seen it sell for less.


No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...