Tuesday, March 21, 2017

computational chemistry - When diagonalising the overlap matrix, what happens if the square root of the diagonal matrix does not exist?


I was looking at the code required for a simple RHF computation when I came across the section for the diagonalisation of the Fock Matrix.


Based on what I know, the diagonal matrix $\mathbf{s}$ is evaluated as


$$\mathbf{s} = \mathbf{U}^\dagger\mathbf{S}\mathbf{U},$$ where $\mathbf{S}$ is the overlap matrix.


The matrix $\mathbf{X}$ is then evaluated as


$$\mathbf{X} = \mathbf{U}\mathbf{s}^{-1/2}\mathbf{U}^\dagger$$


and the diagonalised Fock operator $\mathbf{F'}$ as


$$\mathbf{F'} = \mathbf{X}^\dagger\mathbf{F}\mathbf{X}.$$


But what happens if the matrix $\mathbf{s}$ has terms that are negative? What happens then? Do we simply take the magnitude and carry on?


Thanks!




Answer



The matrix $\mathbf{s}$ in your question are the eigenvalues of the overlap matrix $\mathbf{S}$, further the matrix $\mathbf{U}$ are a matrix of the eigenvector of the overlap matrix. Now looking at the equation that gives you concern:


$$\mathbf{X} = \mathbf{U}\mathbf{s}^{-1/2}\mathbf{U}^\dagger$$


Since $\mathbf{s}$ is a diagonal matrix then taking the power of $\mathbf{s}$ is just taking the power of every element:


$$\mathbf{s}^{-1/2}=\begin{bmatrix}s_1&0&...&0\\0&s_2&...&...\\...&...&...&0\\0&...&0&s_n\end{bmatrix}^{-1/2}=\begin{bmatrix}s_1^{-1/2}&0&...&0\\0&s_2^{-1/2}&...&...\\...&...&...&0\\0&...&0&s_n^{-1/2}\end{bmatrix}$$


The only way as you noted this can cause trouble is if any of the elements of $\mathbf{s}$ are negative. Now here we have to remember that $\mathbf{s}$ are the eigenvalues of the overlap matrix, it is therefore guareenteed that all of the elements will be equal to or greater than zero! For the proof of this see my answer to one of your other questions, Basis sets - negative contraction coefficients?


No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...