Tuesday, January 31, 2017

coordination compounds - Why do transition metals form particularly stable complexes?


The pre-transition metal ions can form complexes but the ligands are weakly bound unless they are multidentate and thus benefit from the chelate effect. For example, crown ethers and cryptands.


However, transition metal ions can form a vast array of stable of stable complexes with monodentate and multidentate ligands. Why is there such a difference between the pre transition elements and the transition metals in this respect.


My initial thoughts are that the transition metal ions will have a higher charge and smaller radius so the electrostatic attraction is larger. I also thought about the d-orbitals but the pre transition elements have d orbitals available, they're just not filled. As a result, is increased stability related to exchange energy or perhaps the lower energy d orbitals? Are there any more factors? Are my suggestions valid?




No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...