From left to right across a period, effective nuclear charge increases in the transition series, just like in the p block, and so atomic size decreases. Here the electrons are being added to the d orbital, where shielding is relatively poor compared to the p orbital. It should follow that the increase in the effective nuclear charge is more significant for the transition elements than the p block in a given period, leading to greater size variation among successive members - but the size variation is smaller in the transition elements instead. In fact atomic size increases from Ni to Zn. Is there any logical explanation for the fact?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions
Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...
-
This is a hard to explain question, but if someone found this board through stackoverflow (I guess that happened to many of us) he/she will ...
-
When, in musaf for Shabbat Rosh Chodesh, we recall the destruction of the Beit Hamikdash, the text indicates not just that our forefathers w...
-
I came across the following in a newspaper article: 藤沢健太教授(宇宙物理学)らの研究グループ The first part (藤沢健太教授) is the name of a professor (Professor Kent...
-
If I wanted to say "I ate something this morning" or "Did you eat something this morning", would I use a particle with &...
No comments:
Post a Comment