From left to right across a period, effective nuclear charge increases in the transition series, just like in the p block, and so atomic size decreases. Here the electrons are being added to the d orbital, where shielding is relatively poor compared to the p orbital. It should follow that the increase in the effective nuclear charge is more significant for the transition elements than the p block in a given period, leading to greater size variation among successive members - but the size variation is smaller in the transition elements instead. In fact atomic size increases from Ni to Zn. Is there any logical explanation for the fact?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions
Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...
-
According to the values of boiling points that I found on internet the order is as follows: $\ce{H2O}$ > $\ce{HF}$ > $\ce{NH3}$ I was ...
-
On-yomi of kanji feel a bit like they all sound alike. For instance, vowels /o/ and /u/ are over-represented. Are there statistics of phonem...
-
Who knows one hundred fifty? Please cite/link your sources, if possible. At some point at least twenty-four hours from now, I will: Upvote a...
-
Who knows seventy? Please cite/link your sources, if possible. At some point in the next few days, I will: Upvote all interesting answers. A...
No comments:
Post a Comment