From left to right across a period, effective nuclear charge increases in the transition series, just like in the p block, and so atomic size decreases. Here the electrons are being added to the d orbital, where shielding is relatively poor compared to the p orbital. It should follow that the increase in the effective nuclear charge is more significant for the transition elements than the p block in a given period, leading to greater size variation among successive members - but the size variation is smaller in the transition elements instead. In fact atomic size increases from Ni to Zn. Is there any logical explanation for the fact?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions
Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...
-
According to the values of boiling points that I found on internet the order is as follows: $\ce{H2O}$ > $\ce{HF}$ > $\ce{NH3}$ I was ...
-
First mechanism is the one taught in lecture, and I wondered why the electrons from carbonyl Oxygen wouldn't react with thionyl chloride...
-
彼ならそれくらいの事はいいかねない Translation: He can say such things. I don’t understand what this なら is added to 彼. I’ve seen it more than once too. Answ...
-
I have seen people seemingly careful to sit down when beginning the paragraph of prayers that starts " Ashre yosh've vesecha "...
No comments:
Post a Comment