Friday, October 26, 2018

Is a leaky integrator the same thing as a low pass filter?


The equation governing a leaky integrator (according to Wikipedia at least) is


dOdt+AO(t)=I(t).


Is a continuous-time leaky integrator thus the same thing as a low pass filter with time-constant A, up to some scaling of the input?



Answer



A so-called leaky integrator is a first-order filter with feedback. Let's find its transfer function, assuming that the input is x(t) and the output y(t):


dy(t)dt+Ay(t)=x(t)


L{dy(t)dt+Ay(t)}=L{x(t)}


where L denotes application of the Laplace transform. Moving forward:


sY(s)+AY(s)=X(s)



H(s)=Y(s)X(s)=1s+A


(taking advantage of the Laplace transform's property that dy(t)dtsY(s), assuming that y(0)=0).


This system, with transfer function H(s), has a single pole at s=A. Remember that its frequency response at frequency ω can be found by letting s=jω:


H(jω)=1jω+A


To get a rough view of this response, first let ω0:


lim


So the system's DC gain is inversely proportional to the feedback factor A. Next, let w \to \infty:


\lim_{\omega \to \infty} H(\omega) = 0


The system's frequency response therefore goes to zero for high frequencies. This follows the rough prototype of a lowpass filter. To answer your other question with respect to its time constant, it's worth checking out the system's time-domain response. Its impulse response can be found by inverse-transforming the transfer function:


H(s) = \frac{1}{s+A} \Leftrightarrow e^{-At}u(t) = h(t)



where u(t) is the Heaviside step function. This is a very common transform that can often be found in tables of Laplace transforms. This impulse response is an exponential decay function, which is usually written in the following format:


h(t) = e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}u(t)


where \tau is defined to be the function's time constant. So, in your example, the system's time constant is \tau = \frac{1}{A}.


No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, \ce{Mg^2+} is closest in radius to \ce{Li+}. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...