The equation governing a leaky integrator (according to Wikipedia at least) is
dOdt+AO(t)=I(t).
Is a continuous-time leaky integrator thus the same thing as a low pass filter with time-constant A, up to some scaling of the input?
Answer
A so-called leaky integrator is a first-order filter with feedback. Let's find its transfer function, assuming that the input is x(t) and the output y(t):
dy(t)dt+Ay(t)=x(t)
L{dy(t)dt+Ay(t)}=L{x(t)}
where L denotes application of the Laplace transform. Moving forward:
sY(s)+AY(s)=X(s)
H(s)=Y(s)X(s)=1s+A
(taking advantage of the Laplace transform's property that dy(t)dt⇔sY(s), assuming that y(0)=0).
This system, with transfer function H(s), has a single pole at s=−A. Remember that its frequency response at frequency ω can be found by letting s=jω:
H(jω)=1jω+A
To get a rough view of this response, first let ω→0:
lim
So the system's DC gain is inversely proportional to the feedback factor A. Next, let w \to \infty:
\lim_{\omega \to \infty} H(\omega) = 0
The system's frequency response therefore goes to zero for high frequencies. This follows the rough prototype of a lowpass filter. To answer your other question with respect to its time constant, it's worth checking out the system's time-domain response. Its impulse response can be found by inverse-transforming the transfer function:
H(s) = \frac{1}{s+A} \Leftrightarrow e^{-At}u(t) = h(t)
where u(t) is the Heaviside step function. This is a very common transform that can often be found in tables of Laplace transforms. This impulse response is an exponential decay function, which is usually written in the following format:
h(t) = e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}u(t)
where \tau is defined to be the function's time constant. So, in your example, the system's time constant is \tau = \frac{1}{A}.
No comments:
Post a Comment