The Lewis definition of an acid is: "a compound or ionic species which can accept an electron pair from a donor compound."
Why does it specify a pair of electrons and not just a single electron?
I initially thought maybe covalent bonds require a pair of electrons but it says that is not the case here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covalent_bond#One-_and_three-electron_bonds
__
For reference:
Question from textbook : Which of the following species can act as a Lewis acid?
NHX3
FX−
HX2 O
NHX4X+
BFX3 (answer)
I thought the answer was NHX4X+ as it could accept an electron, but the Lewis definition specifies accepting a pair of electrons.
Thanks.
Answer
It partially has something to do with the history of acid-base definitions. We started with the Arrhenius definition which was based on the generation of HX+ or OHX− in aqueous solution, and then to the Bronsted-Lowry definition which moved towards acceptance or donation of HX+. Finally came the Lewis Definition which removed HX+ and left us only with electron pairs, to be consistent with the past two definitions. We couldn't just say electrons because that would have included a large class of reactions called redox reactions which are clearly not the same as acid-base.
Now, with respect to your answer to the multiple-choice question:
I thought the answer was NHX4X+ as it could accept an electron, but the Lewis definition specifies accepting a pair of electrons.
There are two points that I would like to draw your attention to:
- You're right in that NHX4X+ is an acid (more specifically we call it a conjugate acid), but by the two older definitions.
- However, NHX4X+ cannot accept even one electron in this case. If you draw the Lewis structure, you'll find that although there is a net positive charge, all hydrogens have 2 electrons and the central Nitrogen has eight, fulfilling the octet rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment