Wednesday, August 29, 2018

grammar - What are the valid potential forms of special "suru" verbs?


Good afternoon all,


From what I understand, special "suru" verbs only have one potential form which is formed using the syntax:


[verb-stem] + [せる]

For example, 愛す・愛する → 愛せる and 訳す・訳する → 訳せる.


However, A Dictionary of Advanced Japanese Grammar claims that "熱する (ねっする)" and "察する (さっする)" conjugates in the same way as "する". Snippet:


enter image description here



By that claim, it seems to mean that the potential form of "熱する" would be "熱できる (uh, ねっできる?)" and the potential form of "訳する" would be "訳できる".


WWWJDIC also has a chart which shows that the potential form of "訳する" is "訳しえる" and/or "訳しうる" (link).


So now we have these potential forms:




  1. [verb-stem] + [せる] (e.g. 愛せる, 訳せる, 熱せる, 察せる)




  2. [verb-stem] + [しえる] (e.g. 愛しえる, 訳しえる, 熱しえる, 察しえる)





  3. [verb-stem] + [しうる] (e.g. 愛しうる, 訳しうる, 熱しうる, 察しうる)




  4. [verb-stem] + [できる] (e.g. 愛できる, 訳できる, 熱できる, 察できる)




Are all of these 4 conjugations grammatically valid potential forms of special "suru" verbs?



Answer



As @fefe mentions, the 4th one is wrong for the examples you mention. I think your grammar book forgot about the potential.



I don't know the detailed etymology, but I guess somehow 愛する, 訳する, 熱する, 察する are more like "proper verbs" (although they inherit most of the irregularities of する), whereas 勉強する etc. are still more like a compound: noun+する, thereby inheriting also the suppleted potential of する, できる.


No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...