Wednesday, September 6, 2017

energy - Is Bond Formation "Strictly" Exothermic?


Is bond formation "strictly" exothermic? The IUPAC definition of exothermic doesn't make any reference to bond formation. However, I have seen the aforementioned statement before - that bond formation is "strictly" exothermic.



I suspect that the answer is "it depends" and that "it depends" at least on how accurately bonds are characterized. For example, the first reaction below is endothermic, while the second one is exothermic:


$\ce{2NO -> ONNO}$.


$\ce{2NO_2 -> O_2NNO_2}$.


Lewis structure analysis for the first reaction at best misleads because one might suspect the nitric oxide molecule as having a bond order of 2.


enter image description here


However, the lone electron is actually delocalized. So the actual $\ce{N-O}$ bond order should be 2.5.


enter image description here


In the $\ce{ONNO}$ molecule however there is no delocalization of electrons and the bond order of the $\ce{N-O}$ bond is 2. So the $\ce{N-O}$ bond is weakened, and even the formation of the $\ce{N-N}$ bond cannot compensate for this weakening.


Also, the above example reminds me of certain unstable homonuclear species. Such as $\ce{Ne_2}$, which according to MO theory has a bond order of 0 - i.e. there is no bond. So I suppose that bond formation is not always exothermic. On the other hand, if the bond order is 0, is a bond really "formed"?



Answer




Bond formation is alway strictly exothermic in the sense of the change of enthalpy.



exothermic reaction A reaction for which the overall standard enthalpy change $\Delta H^\circ$ is negative.



A bond can only exist, if it needs energy to break it, i.e. the bond dissociation energy is always positive.



bond-dissociation energy, $D$ The enthalpy (per mole) required to break a given bond of some specific molecular entity by homolysis, e.g. for $\ce{CH4 -> .CH3 + H.}$, symbolized as $D(\ce{CH3−H})$ (cf. heterolytic bond dissociation energy).



This has absolutely nothing to do with a reaction being exothermic/endothermic or exergonic/endergonic, because this is defined by the rearrangements of bonds.





Regarding noble gas diatomics, it is quite clear from MO-Theory, that there is no bond. However, even these non bonded elements have a non-zero dissociation energy. Please refer to "Why are noble gases stable" and to answers and comments within.


No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...