Electeothermal atomizer ( graphite furnance ) and flame atomizer, are the instruments which help us to convert the analyte into the gas state and they both achieve that. My question is, what's the difference in their way of workig ? I know the flame has its nebulisator which converts the liquid analyte into mist aerosols and then the gas helps the analyte to arrive to the flame. How does the electrothermal atomizer work ? Whats the nebulisator substitution in the graphite furnance ? Why do we have to turn the analytie in mist aerosol in flame AAS ?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions
Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...
-
This is a hard to explain question, but if someone found this board through stackoverflow (I guess that happened to many of us) he/she will ...
-
When, in musaf for Shabbat Rosh Chodesh, we recall the destruction of the Beit Hamikdash, the text indicates not just that our forefathers w...
-
I came across the following in a newspaper article: 藤沢健太教授(宇宙物理学)らの研究グループ The first part (藤沢健太教授) is the name of a professor (Professor Kent...
-
I'm trying to translate somebody's tweet, and I'm just blocking on this one bit. I understand every part ("単行本", "...
No comments:
Post a Comment