Friday, September 21, 2018

Nomenclature of organic compounds containing complex side chains


How do we decide the sequence of substituents in a organic compound if one of the substituents is complex. Should the complex chain must always be written first while writing the IUPAC name or are there any other rules governing it?


The following IUPAC names got me confused:


7-(1,2-dimethylpentyl)-5-ethyltridecane


AND


5,5-dimethyl-6-(1,1-dimethylbutyl)-6-pentyltridecane


In the first compound the complex substituent is written first although p(pentyl) comes after e(ethyl).


In the second compound, the complex substituent is written later although m(methyl) comes after b(butyl).




Answer



Simple prefixes are arranged alphabetically disregarding any multiplicative prefixes. The multiplicative prefixes are inserted later and do not alter the alphabetical order.
For example, ‘1,2-dibromo-’ is considered to begin with ‘b’.


However, the name of a compound substituent is considered to begin with the first letter of its complete name.
For example, ‘1,2-dibromobutyl-’ is considered to begin with ‘d’.


On this matter, the current version of Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book) reads as follows:



P-14.5 ALPHANUMERICAL ORDER


Alphanumerical order has been commonly called ‘alphabetical order’. As these ordering principles do involve ordering both letters and numbers, in a strict sense, it is best called ‘alphanumerical order’ in order to convey the message that both letters and numbers are involved


Alphanumerical order is used to establish the order of citation of detachable substituent prefixes (not the detachable saturation prefixes, hydro and dehydro), and the numbering of a chain, ring, or ring system when a choice is possible.



(…)


P-14.5.1 Simple prefixes (i.e., those describing atoms and unsubstituted substituents) are arranged alphabetically; multiplicative prefixes, if necessary, are then inserted and do not alter the alphabetical order already established.


P-14.5.2 The name of a prefix for a substituent is considered to begin with the first letter of its complete name.



Therefore, the correct alphanumerical order corresponds to the name 7-(1,2-dimethylpentyl)-5-ethyltridecane (not 5-ethyl-7-(1,2-dimethylpentyl)tridecane) since the compound substituent name ‘dimethylpentyl’ starts with ‘d’, and ‘d’ is earlier alphabetically than ‘e’.
(Nevertheless, the preferred IUPAC name is 5-ethyl-7-(3-methylhexan-2-yl)tridecane.)


5-ethyl-7-(3-methylhexan-2-yl)tridecane


In your second example, the correct alphanumerical order corresponds to the name 6-(1,1-dimethylbutyl)-5,5-dimethyl-6-pentyltridecane (not 5,5-dimethyl-6-(1,1-dimethylbutyl)-6-pentyltridecane) since the compound substituent name ‘dimethylbutyl’ starts with ‘d’, and ‘d’ is earlier alphabetically than ‘m’.
(Nevertheless, the preferred IUPAC name is 5,5-dimethyl-6-(2-methylpentan-2-yl)-6-pentyltridecane.)


5,5-dimethyl-6-(2-methylpentan-2-yl)-6-pentyltridecane



No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...