I'm trying to follow the steps from Oppenheim for the derivation of the frequency representation of a signal which is to be down sampled by a factor of M.
It makes sense to me that:
But then the book says to make a change of variables from r to i and k where i = 0,1,...M−1, and k = (-∞,∞). However, I don't really understand how this change of variables comes logically. After making this change of variables it is then easy to see how the downsampled frequency representation is just a sum of scaled and shifted representations of the original sampled sequence. But I would like to be able to make the bridge better between steps and how such a change of variable was concluded.
Answer
In the final result, you want to express the spectrum Xd(ejω) in terms of X(ejω), the spectrum of x[n]=xc(nT). Since X(ejω) is already periodic, it must be possible to represent Xd(ejω) as a sum of a finite number (M) of shifted versions of X(ejω). This is why the original infinite sum is split up into a finite sum of infinite sums, the latter being shifted versions of X(ejω).
I think you shouldn't worry if you think you wouldn't have come up with that change of variables yourself. What is important is that you understand what's going on.
Furthermore, I think it's instructive to understand the derivation of the expression for Xd(ejω) without introducing an auxiliary continuous-time signal xc(t):
Xd(ejω)=∞∑n=−∞x[Mn]e−jnω=∑n=kMx[n]e−jnω/M
where in the second sum we only sum over indices n that are integer multiples of M. If we introduce a sequence d[n] which equals 1 for n=kM (k∈Z), and zero otherwise, we can rewrite (1) as
Xd(ejω)=∞∑n=−∞x[n]d[n]e−jnω/M
An expression for the sequence d[n] satisfying our requirements is
d[n]=1MM−1∑l=0ej2πln/M
Inserting (3) into (2) gives the final result:
Xd(ejω)=1M∞∑n=−∞x[n]M−1∑l=0ej2πln/Me−jnω/M=1MM−1∑l=0∞∑n=−∞x[n]e−jn(ω−2πl)/M=1MM−1∑l=0X(ej(ω−2πl)/M)
No comments:
Post a Comment