Thursday, May 25, 2017

grammar - Grammatical justification for でしかない


The song eX Dream by Myuji (which appears in an anime OP) contains the sentence:



[夢]{ゆめ}は夢でしかない



The general point of the sentence is fairly clear, meaning "a dream is just a dream". But what is the best way to think of the でしかない construction?


At first I saw it as 夢は夢で, as in, "a dream is a dream and...", but now I'm wondering how correct this is or if it's correct at all.



Is it better to look at it as a separation of the parts of である? Does this happen in many other cases, where you use a qualified で followed by ある?



Answer



Let's start with something common:



夢は夢だ。 'Dreams are dreams.'



Let's negate it (using ではない instead of its contracted form じゃない):



夢は夢ではない。 'Dreams are not dreams.'




は is a 係助詞{かかりじょし} ("binding particle"). Any 係助詞 fits in this spot. しか is also a 係助詞:



夢は夢でしかない。'Dreams are nothing but dreams.'





The "modern" grammatical analysis of this stuff is that で is the 連用形{れんようけい} ("continuative form") of the copula だ which results in ではない and でしかない falling nicely into this general rule:



(連用形 of something) + (optional 係助詞) + (ない or ある)



Some other instances of this rule are すごく(は)ないあつく(も)ないバカで(も)ある



No comments:

Post a Comment

periodic trends - Comparing radii in lithium, beryllium, magnesium, aluminium and sodium ions

Apparently the of last four, $\ce{Mg^2+}$ is closest in radius to $\ce{Li+}$. Is this true, and if so, why would a whole larger shell ($\ce{...